India
oi-Ashish Rana
A petitioner has reached Supreme Court challenging restrictions imposed in Delhi ahead of the Cockroach Janta Party’s (CJP) planned protest on October 10. The court asked how it could balance the protesters’ rights with the needs of citizens who rely on public transport and essential services.

The Supreme Court is hearing a case challenging Delhi’s restrictions before an October 10 CJP protest, asking how to balance protester rights with citizens’ access to services and seeking details on organisers and expected turnout, noting train cancellations.
The court also sought details about the protest organisers and the expected number of participants, saying it needed to hear both sides before deciding how to strike a balance.
Supreme Court Seeks Details Of CJP Protest Organisers
During the hearing, SC questioned how it could assess the situation without hearing from the group planning the demonstration. It stressed that the rights of protesters and those of ordinary citizens both needed consideration.
“How do we balance if the scales are not here before us? Give us something,” the court asked the petitioners.
The judges sought information about who was organising the protest and how many people were likely to attend the gathering.
Court Highlights Citizens’ Right To Essential Services
The Supreme Court also said that a fair assessment required the presence of both sides. While protesters have the right to demonstrate, citizens must also be able to access public transport and essential facilities.
“To strike a balance, we need two things, citizens before us who want their basic rights, and the group that wants to protest. We do not have the latter before us,” the court pointed out.
The court’s remarks highlighted the need to consider the possible impact of protest-related restrictions on people who are not part of the demonstration.
Train Cancellations Raised During Hearing
Senior advocate Kapil Sibal told the court that certain trains scheduled to arrive at New Delhi and Hazrat Nizamuddin railway stations between 4 am and 2 pm on October 10 had been cancelled at their source.
The issue was raised as petitioners challenged the restrictions ahead of the planned protest. The court’s questions focused on the need for further details about the organisers and the expected turnout before balancing the competing rights involved.
The hearing took place a day before the proposed demonstration, scheduled for October 10. The court sought information that would help it assess the concerns raised by the petitioners alongside the rights of citizens and protesters.
